← Back to Case Studies

$300/Day to $30,000/Day in 72 Hours — Profitably

How we scaled TotalAV — one of the world’s top 5 antivirus companies — from $300 to $18,500+ daily Facebook ad spend in three days, while holding CPA inside the $45 target.

01 — THE CLIENT

A Top 5 Antivirus Company on a Hard Brief

TotalAV is one of the fastest-growing B2C software companies on the planet. They develop cybersecurity tools across iPhone, iPad, Android, Mac, and Windows — which gave us broad targeting options across every major operating system.

They had thousands of positive Trustpilot reviews. They had a proven product that converted. What they didn’t have yet was a media buying engine that could scale Facebook to seven figures monthly without breaking CPA.

The brief was simple but aggressive: scale as fast as possible, keep CPA under $45, optimise for installs/purchases only — no awareness, no engagement, no fluff.

02 — ONBOARDING

40 Creatives, 5 Dynamic Sets, Q4 Ready

Before we touched a single dollar of spend, we built the creative library. 40 different creatives placed inside 5 separate dynamic creative ad sets — letting Facebook test combinations of headlines, primary text, and visual assets to find the winners fast.

The client had previously run Facebook ads internally with limited success. They saw some results but couldn’t get past the inconsistency that comes from low-volume testing on a volatile platform. They had also prepared multiple landing pages, which gave us extra winners to find on the conversion side.

With Q4 looming, we wanted everything ready to compete in a high-CPM auction environment from day one.

03 — THE FAST SCALE

October 7–16, 2019: Day-by-Day

This is the actual scale, day-by-day, exactly as it ran:

Mon Oct 7 — $305 spent / 26 purchases / $11.75 CPA

Test mode. Two creatives running at $300/day to find a winner. Found it inside 24 hours and had margin to push.

Tue Oct 8 — $10,521 spent / 272 purchases / $38.68 CPA

Massive push. Spend went from $305 to $10,521 — a 34x jump in 24 hours. CPA stayed at $38.68, comfortably inside the $45 target. Auction demand was low so we set up the next push.

Wed Oct 9 — $15,477 spent / 366 purchases / $42.29 CPA

Pushed harder. Spend hit $15,477. By constantly monitoring ad set performance through the day and pulling underperformers, we kept CPA at $42.29 — still inside target.

Thu Oct 10 — $5,756 / Slowdown weekend

The client hit fulfilment and tracking issues. Rather than pushing through and breaking the relationship, we throttled spend over the weekend down to ~$5K/day while they sorted infrastructure. Total weekend spend ~$21,000. Once issues were fixed, we re-armed for round two.

Sun Oct 13 → Tue Oct 15 — Round 2: $7K → $18,500/day in 3 days

Sunday was a quiet $7,316 prep day. Monday Oct 14 we began pushing again — combining automatic bids on the proven ad sets with manual bid testing on new variants at low and high bid levels. CPA held in line.

By Tuesday Oct 15 we hit $18,583 in a single day. By Wednesday Oct 16 we were at $18,967. CPA stayed at $41.51 — still inside the $45 target after a 2.6x scale.

04 — TWO-WEEK TOTAL

$130K Spent · 3,192 Purchases · CPA $40.56

Across the full two-week scaling campaign on Facebook and Instagram:

• $129,468 total ad spend
• 3,192 tracked purchases
• $40.56 blended CPA — inside the $45 target
• 2.2 million people reached

05 — WHAT MADE IT WORK

Five Things Most Agencies Get Wrong

• Multiple creatives prepared in advance. Having 40 creatives ready before launch meant we could identify the winning combination inside 24 hours of testing. Most agencies test 4–6 and stall for weeks.
• Dynamic creatives for fast testing. 5 dynamic creative ad sets let Facebook auto-test thousands of combinations cheaply. Cheaper learnings, faster winners.
• Auto + manual bids in parallel. Auto bidding alone has a ceiling — competitors using manual bids win the high-intent auctions. We ran both, in parallel, on the same audiences.
• Track tracking issues early. We hit a tracking gap on Day 4 and slowed down rather than spending blind. Inconsistent tracking can kill a fast scale — we caught it before it cost us.
• Multiple ad accounts and pixels. Splitting Android, iPhone, and desktop traffic across separate ad accounts kept the optimisation data clean. Mixed-OS data inside one account would have diluted the pixel learning.

06 — THE TAKEAWAY

$0 to $20K/Day in 3–4 Days Is Repeatable

This isn’t a one-off lucky scale. With the right preparation — multiple creatives, dynamic ad sets, broad audiences with mature pixels, manual bid testing, and clean account architecture — going from $0 to $20K/day in three or four days is something we’ve replicated across multiple clients.

The key constraints aren’t the platform. They’re three things on the client side: auction demand (timing matters — Q4 helps), good creatives ready to deploy, and fulfilment capacity to handle the volume when it hits.

If you’ve got those three, the scale is engineering, not luck.